Antivirus Performance Comparison
It is important to understand the amount of computer resources the antivirus program will consume. The best programs have minimal impact on system performance while providing superior security against malware and viruses.
The most well-known antivirus software companies have extensive test programs that are widely published in PDF format that is downloadable. The reports offer a brief overview of the protection, performance, and usability of each suite. They also contain detailed charts and graphs that show the results of specific testing elements. Key figures to look out for include the percent of real-world and reference set malware threats that are blocked, neutralised, or avastantivirusreview.com/reliable-security-top-best-free-antivirus compromised by the program and the number of false positive detections for benign software.
In AV-Comparatives’ tests in June 2023, Avast Free Antivirus for Mac had the highest percentage of pass rates in blocking Mac malware and PUAs (potentially unwanted applications) and the second highest score for Windows virus detection. It also scored highly for the categories of passive, full-scan and quick-scan.
Bitdefender Total Security was the most non-intrusive paid program followed by Kaspersky Total Security, and ESET Security Cloud Free. However, it was the most slow in the full scan and quick-scan categories. Its minimal background impact might be due to the fact that it doesn’t run by default on Windows 10 and 11, like its competitors do.
Intego X10 had the lowest overall system impact on the background and full scan however it was able to find every single piece of malware tested. It’s not often that you find a company which solely focuses on Macs. This makes it a useful component to any security arsenal.